Training and Popular Education
Training and popular education are strategies intended to build individuals’ and groups’ capacity to understand structural racism, practice analyzing and applying, and build confidence and skills to act individually and collectively. Groups using these strategies should note that, while they are important components of a comprehensive effort, training should not be confused with doing the work itself.
Content in this section also includes descriptions, lessons learned, evaluations and critiques. Also see the CURRICULA tab for information about Racial Equity Learning and Transforming White Privilege modules and World Trust Educational Service’s learning films.
Introducing Transformative Learning Theory
Sharing the Lessons Learned: Reflections on Six Years of Anti-Racism Work
David Rogers and Moira Bowman
Dismantling Racism Project, Western States Center (WSC)
Training for Racial Equity and Inclusion: A Guide to Selected Programs
Ilana Shapiro, Ph.D., et al.
Project Change; The Aspen Institute; CAPD; Alliance for Conflict Transformation
Under the Radar: Popular Education in North America
COMM-ORG, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Anti-Oppressive Facilitation for Democratic Process: Making Meetings Awesome for Everyone
AORTA (Anti-Oppression Resource and Training Alliance)
Facilitation Tools for Meetings and Workshops
Seeds for Change
Showing What We Tell: Facilitating Antiracist Education in Cross-Racial Teams
Robin DiAngelo and Darlene Flynn
Understanding and Dismantling Privilege Journal
Why Trump's Diversity Training Ban Is Unconstitutional
Othering & Belonging Institute
Abolish Columbus Day: Solidarity with Indigenous Peoples: Resources and Tools
Bill Bigelow and Tanya H. Lee
Zinn Education Project, Teaching for Change
Building Capacity for Changing Communities
Terry Keleher and Josina Morita
Racial Justice Leadership Initiative (RJLI) of the Applied Research Center (ARC)
Diversity Training: Good for Business but Insufficient for Social Change
Western States Center (WSC)
Studying Repression and Resistance with A Troublemakers’ Guide: Principles for Racial Justice Activists In the Face of State Repression
Lesson Plans and Curricula
Workbooks and Tools
Communication Guidelines for a Brave Space
AWARE-LA; Freedoms Foundation
Anti-Oppression Resources and Exercises
Organizing for Power, Organizing for Change Site
Dismantling Racism: 2016 Workbook
Facilitator’s Guide for Continuous Improvement Conversations With A Racial Equity Lens
Shanee Helfer and Hafizah Omar, et al.
Liberatory Design: Your Toolkit to Design for Equity
Tania Anaissie, Victor Cary, David Clifford, Tom Malarkey, and Susie Wise
Stanford d.school’s K12Lab Network; The National Equity Project
Standing Together, Coming Out for Racial Justice: An Anti-Racist Organizational Development Toolkit for LGBT Equality Groups and Activists
Basic Rights Educational Fund
Systems Thinking and Race: Workshop Summary
john a. powell, Connie Cagampang Heller, and Fayza Bundalli
The California Endowment
Tools for Organizers, Facilitators and Trainers
“We all have a sphere of influence. Each of us needs to find our own sources of courage so that we can begin to speak. There are many problems to address, and we cannot avoid them indefinitely. We cannot continue to be silent. We must begin to speak, knowing that words alone are insufficient. But I have seen that meaningful dialogue can lead to effective action. Change is possible.”
~ Beverly Daniel Tatum, “Why Are All The Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria?”: A Psychologist Explains the Development of Racial Identity
Indigenous Land Acknowledgment – Zach Serrano, National Equity Project
Also in this section:
Addressing Trauma and Healing
Caucus and Affinity Groups
Hate Crimes Prevention and Response
Conflict Transformation and Restorative Justice
Organizational Change Process
Youth Activism and Intergenerational Work
Arts and Culture
Dialogue and Deliberation
Policy and Legislative Change
An anti-racist is someone who is supporting an antiracist policy through their actions or expressing antiracist ideas. This includes the expression of ideas that racial groups are equals and do not need developing, and supporting policies that reduce racial inequity.
SOURCE: Ibram X. Kendi, How To Be An Antiracist, Random House, 2019.
Caucusing (Affinity Groups)
A caucus is an intentionally created space for those who share an identity to convene for learning, support, and connections. Caucuses based on racial identity are often comprised, respectively, of people of color, white people, people who hold multiracial identities, or people who share specific racial or ethnic identities.
To advance racial equity, there is work for white people and people of color to do separately and together. Caucuses provide spaces for people to work within their own racial/ethnic groups. For white people, a caucus provides time and space to work explicitly and intentionally on understanding white culture and white privilege and to increase one’s critical analysis around these concepts. A white caucus also puts the onus on white people to teach each other about these ideas, rather than placing a burden on people of color to teach them. For people of color, a caucus is a place to work with peers to address the impact of racism, to interrupt experiences of internalized racism, and to create a space for healing and working for individual and collective liberation. At times, people of color may also break into more specific race-based caucuses, sometimes based on experiences with a particular issue, for example police violence, immigration, or land rights. Groups that use caucuses in their organizational racial equity work, especially in workplaces and coalitions, generally meet separately and create a process to rejoin and work together collectively.
SOURCE: RacialEquityTools.org (ACT / Strategies / Caucus and Affinity Groups)
Related Resources: Caucus and Affinity Groups
Location: ACT / Strategies
Also known as unconscious or hidden bias, implicit biases are negative associations that people unknowingly hold. They are expressed automatically, without conscious awareness. Many studies have indicated that implicit biases affect individuals’ attitudes and actions, thus creating real-world implications, even though individuals may not even be aware that those biases exist within themselves. Notably, implicit biases have been shown to trump individuals’ stated commitments to equality and fairness, thereby producing behavior that diverges from the explicit attitudes that many people profess. The Implicit Association Test (IAT) is often used to measure implicit biases with regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, age, religion, and other topics.
SOURCE: Cheryl Staats, State of the Science: Implicit Bias Review 2013, Kirwan Institute, The Ohio State University.
Related Resources: Implicit Bias
Location: ACT / Communicating
The everyday verbal, nonverbal, and environmental slights, snubs, or insults, whether intentional or unintentional, which communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative messages to target persons based solely upon their marginalized group membership.
SOURCE: Derald Wing Sue, PhD, “Microaggressions: More than Just Race” (Psychology Today, 17 November 2010).
A process of learning about and becoming allies with people from other cultures, thereby broadening our own understanding and ability to participate in a multicultural process. The key element to becoming more culturally competent is respect for the ways that others live in and organize the world and an openness to learn from them.
SOURCE: Paul Kivel, “Multicultural Competence” (2007).
Related Resources: Multicultural Competency
Location: ACT / Strategies
Power is unequally distributed globally and in U.S. society; some individuals or groups wield greater power than others, thereby allowing them greater access and control over resources. Wealth, whiteness, citizenship, patriarchy, heterosexism, and education are a few key social mechanisms through which power operates. Although power is often conceptualized as power overother individuals or groups, other variations are power with (used in the context of building collective strength) and power within (which references an individual’s internal strength). Learning to “see” and understand relations of power is vital to organizing for progressive social change.
Power may also be understood as the ability to influence others and impose one’s beliefs. All power is relational, and the different relationships either reinforce or disrupt one another. The importance of the concept of power to anti-racism is clear: racism cannot be understood without understanding that power is not only an individual relationship but a cultural one, and that power relationships are shifting constantly. Power can be used malignantly and intentionally, but need not be, and individuals within a culture may benefit from power of which they are unaware.
Reconciliation involves three ideas. First, it recognizes that racism in America is both systemic and institutionalized, with far–reaching effects on both political engagement and economic opportunities for minorities. Second, reconciliation is engendered by empowering local communities through relationship-building and truth-telling. Lastly, justice is the essential component of the conciliatory process—justice that is best termed as restorative rather than retributive, while still maintaining its vital punitive character.
Restorative Justice is a theory of justice that emphasizes repairing the harm caused by crime and conflict. It places decisions in the hands of those who have been most affected by a wrongdoing, and gives equal concern to the victim, the offender, and the surrounding community. Restorative responses are meant to repair harm, heal broken relationships, and address the underlying reasons for the offense. Restorative Justice emphasizes individual and collective accountability. Crime and conflict generate opportunities to build community and increase grassroots power when restorative practices are employed.
SOURCE: The Movement for Black Lives (M4BL), “Glossary.”
White Supremacy Culture
White Supremacy Culture refers to the dominant, unquestioned standards of behavior and ways of functioning embodied by the vast majority of institutions in the United States. These standards may be seen as mainstream, dominant cultural practices; they have evolved from the United States’ history of white supremacy. Because it is so normalized it can be hard to see, which only adds to its powerful hold. In many ways, it is indistinguishable from what we might call U.S. culture or norms – a focus on individuals over groups, for example, or an emphasis on the written word as a form of professional communication. But it operates in even more subtle ways, by actually defining what “normal” is – and likewise, what “professional,” “effective,” or even “good” is. In turn, white culture also defines what is not good, “at risk,” or “unsustainable.” White culture values some ways of thinking, behaving, deciding, and knowing – ways that are more familiar and come more naturally to those from a white, western tradition – while devaluing or rendering invisible other ways. And it does this without ever having to explicitly say so...
An artificial, historically constructed culture which expresses, justifies, and binds together the United States white supremacy system. It is the glue that binds together white-controlled institutions into systems and white-controlled systems into the global white supremacy system.
1. Gita Gulati-Partee and Maggie Potapchuk, “Paying Attention to White Culture and Privilege: A Missing Link to Advancing Racial Equity” (The Foundation Review vol. 6: issue 1, 2014).
2. Sharon Martinas and the Challenging White Supremacy Workshop, 4th revision (1995).